🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and apps are "robbing our kids' youth". The policy could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to pass a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised families to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a good starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Last year, interest gathered behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to disturbing online content contends that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to design products and services that are secure and suitable for children," stated a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws requiring adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of Europe and the US, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies take a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could backfire". The body points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

As this worldwide conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers show that states around the world are less and less content to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.